Skip to content
Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest news from tastytech.

    What's Hot

    Assassin’s Creed officially has 3 brand-new games coming soon

    July 11, 2026

    Evil Dead Burn review – struggles to stay alight

    July 11, 2026

    2026 Suzuki Jimny vs Renault Duster comparison

    July 11, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    tastytech.intastytech.in
    Subscribe
    • AI News & Trends
    • Tech News
    • AI Tools
    • Business & Startups
    • Guides & Tutorials
    • Tech Reviews
    • Automobiles
    • Gaming
    • movies
    tastytech.intastytech.in
    Home»AI Tools»Trump administration subpoenas New York Times reporters over coverage | Donald Trump News
    Trump administration subpoenas New York Times reporters over coverage | Donald Trump News
    AI Tools

    Trump administration subpoenas New York Times reporters over coverage | Donald Trump News

    gvfx00@gmail.comBy gvfx00@gmail.comJuly 11, 2026No Comments6 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The administration of United States President Donald Trump has issued subpoenas against journalists from The New York Times, in what advocates say is an escalating attack on the free press.

    Late on Friday, the Times reported that at least four of its reporters have received subpoenas, some delivered to their homes by federal agents.

    Table of Contents

    Toggle
    • Recommended Stories
    • Scrutiny on NATO travel coverage
    • A testy relationship with journalists
      • Related posts:
    • Bain sees US$100 billion SaaS market in agentic AI automation
    • SAP and ANYbotics drive industrial adoption of physical AI
    • India defeat Bangladesh to maintain Women’s T20 World Cup semifinal bid | Cricket

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    Those subpoenas compel them to testify before a grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday.

    “The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” said David McCraw, the newspaper’s lawyer, in a statement quoted by the Times.

    News of the subpoenas prompted outcry from leading news groups including the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), which demanded their withdrawal.

    “The subpoenas are an extraordinary escalation in President Trump’s efforts to threaten and intimidate independent news organizations, and have a chilling effect on the work of journalists across the country,” said CPJ’s chief executive officer Jodie Ginsberg.

    The subpoenas were authorised by a top official in Trump’s Department of Justice: Jay Clayton, the US attorney for the Southern District of New York.

    Clayton is in line to succeed Bill Pulte as the director of national intelligence, a cabinet-level role Pulte holds on an interim basis. The Senate is set to begin hearings on Clayton’s confirmation next week.

    Scrutiny on NATO travel coverage

    At issue is The New York Times coverage of Trump’s return flight from the 2026 NATO summit in Ankara, Turkiye, this week.

    While Trump flew to Europe on his new Air Force One, a jet gifted by Qatar and retrofitted by the US military, he left on the old Air Force One.

    Trump claimed the switch was made to allow the new jet to visit RAF Mildenhall, an air force base in Suffolk, England, that supports US military operations.

    He framed it as an opportunity to allow military members to tour the aircraft.

    “It’s going to go to a couple of bases,” Trump said at the time, “so the soldiers can see it because it’s truly magnificent.”

    But at the same July 8 news conference, Trump referenced concerns about his safety.

    When asked about the airline switch by a reporter from The New York Post, Trump responded, “You know, the life of a president is very dangerous.” He proceeded to add that he’s “number one on the kill list for Iran”.

    That same day, The New York Times reported swapped his new presidential jet for his old one because of security concerns, citing anonymous sources. The change reportedly came at the urging of the Secret Service.

    Then, the next day, the Times expanded its coverage with a follow-up report, indicating that the new Air Force One lacked the security capabilities of the old jet.

    The article anonymously cited two former Air Force officials as saying there would not have been enough time to make the necessary upgrades before the Ankara flight.

    It is unclear what modifications have already been made, but experts have estimated that the updates could cost up to $1bn.

    Friday’s subpoenas targeted four of the journalists involved in the Times’s reporting on the subject: Eric Schmitt, Tyler Pager, Eric Lipton and Julian E Barnes.

    According to the Times, before the subpoenas were issued, the newspaper was contacted by a senior official from the FBI.

    That person, who was unnamed, asked the newspaper to hold off on its reporting about Air Force One, citing national security. The FBI official also requested information on the Times’s anonymous sources.

    The newspaper, however, declined to provide such information, in line with standard journalistic practice.

    A testy relationship with journalists

    The subpoenas mark the latest clash between the Trump administration and US media outlets that report on its activities.

    Trump himself has a long-running feud with the Times. In September, he sued the newspaper for $15bn in damages, alleging it had defamed him and attempted to “sabotage” his candidacy in the 2024 presidential election, which he won.

    After his initial complaint was thrown out as “improper”, Trump refiled it in October.

    The Times, for its part, has sued the Department of Defence under Trump over its attempts to impose media restrictions on journalists.

    Just this week, the Times also filed a countersuit against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, after it alleged the newspaper had discriminated against a white, male employee for failing to give him a promotion.

    The Times has described the effort as an attempt to muffle the press, in violation of the free-speech protections enshrined in the US Constitution’s First Amendment.

    The Times is not the only newspaper to face legal backlash from the Trump administration. In December, Trump launched a $10bn lawsuit against the BBC, arguing that a documentary it aired misrepresented his speech before the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

    Trump is also seeking $10bn from The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on a birthday message he allegedly sent to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. After that suit was thrown out, Trump refiled it in May.

    The Trump administration has also taken actions against individual journalists.

    In January, for instance, the FBI executed a raid on the house of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who covered the Trump administration’s efforts to scale back the federal workforce.

    The raid came as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of leaking information to the news media, but at least two judges have barred the Trump administration from using the information it seized from Natanson.

    The Trump administration has denied seeking to erode the freedom of the press, instead citing national security needs.

    But McCraw, the Times lawyer, argued that, with the latest subpoenas, the White House was trying to restrict “the American public’s right to know how their government is operating”.

    “This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs,” he said.

    Top Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, also weighed in on the subpoenas, using them to slam Trump as corrupt.

    “Donald Trump is one of the weakest, most thin-skinned individuals the world has ever seen,” Schumer wrote on social media.

    “Reporters have the right and duty to report the truth. It’s not their fault his foreign-gifted plane is a national security threat. This subpoena is a gross overreach and a disgusting misuse of federal law enforcement resources that should alarm every American.”

    Related posts:

    Celta Vigo earn shock 2-0 win at the Bernabeu as Real Madrid implode | Football News

    Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,321 | Russia-Ukraine war News

    How the Royal Navy is using AI to cut its recruitment workload

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe Next Solar Eclipse Is Delivering a Rare Sight: Totality at Sunset
    Next Article 2026 Suzuki Jimny vs Renault Duster comparison
    gvfx00@gmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    AI Tools

    What is going on in Yemen? | Houthis

    July 11, 2026
    AI Tools

    Argentina vs Switzerland: World Cup quarterfinal – Messi, prediction, news | World Cup 2026 News

    July 11, 2026
    AI Tools

    Nicaragua strips lawyers of certification in latest crackdown on dissent | Human Rights News

    July 11, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Black Swans in Artificial Intelligence — Dan Rose AI

    October 2, 2025207 Views

    Every Clue That Tony Stark Was Always Doctor Doom

    October 20, 2025131 Views

    We let ChatGPT judge impossible superhero debates — here’s how it ruled

    December 31, 2025100 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from tastytech.

    About Us
    About Us

    TastyTech.in brings you the latest AI, tech news, cybersecurity tips, and gadget insights all in one place. Stay informed, stay secure, and stay ahead with us!

    Most Popular

    Black Swans in Artificial Intelligence — Dan Rose AI

    October 2, 2025207 Views

    Every Clue That Tony Stark Was Always Doctor Doom

    October 20, 2025131 Views

    We let ChatGPT judge impossible superhero debates — here’s how it ruled

    December 31, 2025100 Views

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest news from tastytech.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Homepage
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    © 2026 TastyTech. Designed by TastyTech.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.